Search This Blog

Friday, April 26, 2013

Better Dying Through Chemistry

Better Living Through Chemistry



If the rebels take over Syria, and if the factions which are aligned with Al Qa'ida take over much of the rebels, who gets the chemical weapon stockpile?

How many soldiers of which nations go into the hornets' nest and secure them, since they are probably at multiple locations?


How many people have chemical weapons in Syria?
https://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/01/28/hacked-emails-reveal-washington-approved-plan-to-stage-false-flag-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/

 “Mention of acquiring chemical weapons from Libya is particularly troubling. Libya’s arsenal had fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists with NATO assistance in 2011 in the culmination of efforts to overthrow the North African nation . Since then, Libya’s militants led by commanders of Al Qaeda’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists across the Arab World, from as far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.”

On January 28, 2013, it was reported that a UK defense contractor was planning a false chemical attack to bring about active NATO intervention against Syria:

Is UK Defense Contractor Planning Syrian WMD False Flag?
Unconfirmed "leaked" documents indicate Washington-approved, Qatari-funded false flag attack using Libyan chemical weapons in Homs, Syria.
January 28, 2013 (LD)

Documents allegedly "hacked" belonging to UK-based defense contractor Britam (official website here) appear to show the company considering an offer from Qatar to use Libyan chemical weapons in Homs, Syria in order to frame both the Syrian and Russian governments. The plan involves using Britam's Ukrainian mercenaries and Soviet-era chemical weapon shells brought in from Libya's large, Al Qaeda-linked, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) controlled arsenals...

There is a YouTube video purporting to be Syrian rebels testing chemicals...
I have not watched it, however.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H-6O-gApVrU


--

No comments: